Contacts for Survey Distribution - Each attendee was asked for an opinion on where the group should next proceed, especially in regards to the survey published by the COQA last year. Suggestions and comments follow:

• Positive feedback on the survey
• The COQA needs to develop a relationship with the producers
• Sometimes the production companies are different from the chemical companies that manage the injection
• Awareness of the problems that production chemicals could cause is growing
• We should build an inventory or database of "cause and effect" that can be documented from our own experiences
• Some areas of the world require a full disclose of all additives injected and in what amounts; precedent has been set for chemical disclosure
• Investigate possible publication in an industry journal for better awareness
• Can also utilize existing forums such as the API Pipeline Committee to foster awareness
• Need to show producers an economic incentive for additive awareness, for example, what does an additive problem cost a refinery versus what is saves the producer
• The additive tracking mechanism being worked on by the Canadians will be helpful in establishing what exactly in the crude might have caused a problem
• Expanding the survey to include ranges of how much additive might be "allowable" would be very useful
• Investigate collecting anecdotal stories of additive problems, maybe adding those to the cause and effect database
• Anecdotal stories may already be available though API or the chemical suppliers